The Professional Workplace Dilemma Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

The Professional Workplace Dilemma - Essay ExampleI also had a duty to the company to repair the difficulty as it had resulted in unproductive workers working the process to apply the illusion of an acceptable level of work. It was damaging to company profits as well as employee morale. at that place was also the obligation I had to myself, which was to do the right thing and present a creative theme when I pointed out the problem.I felt confident confronting this issue, for as Vallance (1995) points out, Ordinary decency and distributive justice are, then, the profound ethical principals of corporate governance (p. 135). Initially I pointed out the problem to Pamela, my immediate supervisor. She could readily go across what the issue was and was in total agreement that the problem needed addressed. I offered her a simple and high-toned solution. I later met with Christy, Pamelas manager, and reiterated the same information I had presented in the earlier matching. Christy sa id she would meet with Jeff, the newly hired manager who had initiated the flawed agreement. I was careful to communicate that the cost to the company, as well as the treatment of my small staff and co-workers, was unacceptable. Later, Christy advised me that Jeff would not consider changing the error and further had refused to meet with me. Christy strongly suggested I drop the subject and not risk my own career by pursue a meeting or discussing this with my employees and peers.Analyzing the DilemmaBecause each successive layer of management involved had to a greater extent authority than the preceding one, it put me at a great disadvantage. I was relatively powerless and my completely leverage was the relationship I had with my workers and our excellent work record. However, keeping quiet and accepting the flawed system did not seem to be an option for me. My instinct told me that the issue needed to be corrected to be fair to all employees as well as create a benefit for the company by not rewarding the most unethical employees. I also had an ethical obligation to protect my melodic line and provide myself with a livelihood. I valued fairness, truth, and the rewarding of honest work and found that accepting the period system would leave me with a feeling that I had been indifferent, and had not done all I could to correct the issue. I perceived two options, both that risked compromising my own values and sense of ethics. I could do nothing, live with the indifference, and protect my job and career. This avenue seemed selfish and unacceptable. I also had the option of pursuing the problem at the risk of my personal well being. There was only a small chance that I might succeed and a real threat of termination. I decided to enlist the support of my workers and peers on the issue and had several conversations with them in reference to the inherent unfairness of the new system. It had become clear that I would either get the formula changed for the benefi t of everyone, or be let go to the detriment of myself. My control authority and power were ineffective at altering managements top-down directive leadership style or their unreasonable policy.The Outcome of the DilemmaThough I was able to get the support of the workers and other halfway managers, that small power base was not adequate to deal with the authority of the upper staff. It further modify the situation and resulted in an acrimonious attitude towards me. I was viewed as a troublemaker